Legal Opinion

Aluminum Co. of America v. Home Can Manufacturing Corp.

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided June 28, 1985No. 84-2496PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Hartman

Defendant, Richard A. Keefe, incorrectly named in the pleadings as Richard Keefe, Sr. (hereinafter referred to as defendant), appeals from a judgment of the circuit court finding him secondarily liable on a note executed by codefendant Home Can Manufacturing Corporation (Home Can) and awarding plaintiff, Aluminum Company of America, also known as ALCOA, $16,248.61 plus $8,361.77 in interest, or a total of $24,610.38. 1 Defendant’s primary argument on appeal is that he was discharged from liability as a guarantor of the note by the subsequent making of six installment notes without his consent…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. People Ex Rel. Brown v. BakerIllinois Supreme Court · 1981
  2. Weger v. Robinson Nash Motor Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1930
  3. White v. WalkerIllinois Supreme Court · 1863
  4. Faith v. MartoccioAppellate Court of Illinois · 1974
  5. Keller v. North American Life InsuranceIllinois Supreme Court · 1921

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Pielet v. PieletIllinois Supreme Court · 2012
  2. People v. BavasAppellate Court of Illinois · 1993
  3. McCall v. Chicago Board of EducationAppellate Court of Illinois · 1992
  4. Keefe v. Aluminum Co. of AmericaAppellate Court of Illinois · 1988
  5. First Midwest Bank v. Thunder Road, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2005

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API