Legal Opinion

P.N. v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided December 13, 1983No. 82-1870PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SCHWARTZ, Chief Judge.

The appellant was adjudicated delinquent based on a finding that he was guilty of grand theft. That determination was in turn founded upon the presumption of guilty knowledge which arose from the fact that he was in possession of a recently stolen moped. Section 812.022(2), Florida Statutes (1981). When he was stopped by the police, P.N. told the officer first that he had borrowed the moped from a cousin, then a brother, and finally — as he testified at trial — from an otherwise unidentified friend named Victor Cruz. We conclude that the multiplicity of alternative…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. State v. YoungSupreme Court of Florida · 1968
  2. State v. GrahamSupreme Court of Florida · 1970
  3. R. A. L. v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1981
  4. A. R. v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1981
  5. State v. FoxDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1981

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Jackson v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1999
  2. N.C. v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1985
  3. Bertone v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2004
  4. State v. ElkinDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1992
  5. C.T. v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2017

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API