Legal Opinion

Yee Chuck v. Board of Trustees

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 4, 1960No. Civ. 18542PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDuniway, J.

Defendants appeal from a judgment against both of them, entered upon a jury verdict in an action for personal injuries, in the sum of $20,000. Defendant, the Board of Trustees of the Leland Stanford Junior University (Stanford), claims error in giving and refusing instructions. Defendant Woodward Clyde and Associates (Contractor) claims insufficiency of the evidence to establish any negligence on its part; that its own negligence, if any, did not cause the accident; that the negligence, if any, was that of Stanford alone; that plaintiff was, as a matter of law, a trespasser to whom it owed no…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Oettinger v. StewartCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
  2. Crane v. SmithCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
  3. Johnston v. LongCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
  4. Johnston v. De La Guerra Properties, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1946
  5. Bridgman v. Safeway Stores, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1960

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Low v. City of SacramentoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
  2. David Finazzo v. Fire Equipment CompanyMichigan Court of Appeals · 2018
  3. Loughan v. Harger-HaldemanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
  4. Covo v. LobueCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
  5. Gonzalez v. Russell Sorensen ConstructionCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2012

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API