Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Farley v. Board of School Directors

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided February 5, 1971No. 53PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBeilfuss, J.

The motion to quash a writ of mandamus serves the same purpose as a demurrer to a complaint. The basic issue is — do the facts alleged in the amended petition state a cause of action. The facts (but not the conclusions or statements of law) as pleaded are, for the purpose of the motion, considered to be true and the petition is to be liberally construed.

We believe the contentions of the parties are within these three issues:(1) Did the plaintiff-appellant acquire permanent tenure as an employee of the Board of School Directors in an administrative position pursuant to sec. 3.08 of the rules…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Lester v. Board of Education of School District No. 119Appellate Court of Illinois · 1967
  2. School City of Peru v. State Ex Rel. YoungbloodIndiana Supreme Court · 1937
  3. Boody v. School CommitteeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1931
  4. Street v. Ferndale Board of EducationMichigan Supreme Court · 1960

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Delagorges v. Board of EducationSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1979
  2. Watkins v. Milwaukee County Civil Service CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1979
  3. Graney v. Board of Regents of University of Wisconsin SystemWisconsin Supreme Court · 1979
  4. State Ex Rel. Dalton v. MundyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1977
  5. Burns v. City of MadisonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1979

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API