State v. Higginbotham
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
Rogosheske, Justice.
Defendant, Gary Higginbotham, appeals from a second-degree murder conviction. Because we hold inadmissible a declaration against penal interest which is not proven trustworthy by independent evidence, and because the United States Supreme Court has held that the Sixth Amendment does not grant the right to have counsel present at a postindictment photographic identification, we affirm the conviction.
The killing occurred as a result of a racial slur uttered by the deceased, Richard Bushey. On the night of the homicide, Bushey and a few friends were standing in the street…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Chambers v. MississippiSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- United States v. AshSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Donnelly v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
- In Re Estate of ForsytheSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1946
- Brown v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 1911
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- Laumer v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1979
- State v. GoldSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
- State v. DeFreitasSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
- State v. OlsenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
- Commonwealth v. CarrMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1977
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.