Legal Opinion

Dickman v. Union Railway Co.

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Decided March 13, 1929Published

1Per curiam

The moving papers claimed no irregularity in the proceedings on which the default judgment was based. Section 129 of the Municipal Court Code would, therefore, appear to preclude the opening of the default after a year had elapsed. (Stoneware Elec. Stove Works v. Barrett, 117 Misc. 699; Scott v. Hemmer, 131 id. 474; affd., 223 App. Div. 872.)

Respondent attempts to excuse its laches by proof of the fact that it had no notice of the default or judgment. While section 108 of the Civil Practice Act provides that such applications are to be made within one year after notice of the judgment,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Stoneware Electric Stove Works v. BarrettAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1922
  2. Scott v. HemmerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1928

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API