Legal Opinion

Thompson v. State

Alabama Court of Appeals

Decided June 30, 1923No. 2 Div. 257PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRoster, J.

The defendant, appellant, was convicted of treating or offering to treat diseases of human beings without having first obtained a certificate of qualification from the state board of medical examiners of Alabama.

The first and second counts of the indictment were substantially in the words of the statute. Section 7564, Code 1907, as amended. Acts 1915, p. 661. The third count was withdrawn, and the fourth count charged that defendant did treat or offer to treat C. A. Patterson, a' human being, for rheumatism, or other disease of human beings for a reward without having first obtained a…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Gunter v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1887
  2. Kirby v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1878
  3. Porter & Co. v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1877
  4. Williamson v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1918

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. People v. LewisMichigan Supreme Court · 1925
  2. Samples v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1923
  3. Owen v. State Ex Rel. BailesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1941
  4. Wideman v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1924
  5. Fason v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1924

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API