Johnson v. Transportation Agency
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Concurring in part, dissenting in partWallace, Circuit Judge
This “reverse discrimination” case presents some difficult questions arising from the application of an affirmative action plan. I conclude that the record before us is insufficient to make broad pronouncements of judicial policy. I would vacate and remand this case for two reasons. First, the record suggests that the *760district court improperly allocated the burdens of persuasion and production between the parties. Second, the court did not make sufficiently detailed findings on the plan to hold it invalid.
I
The facts of this case, referred to in part by the majority, are significant. Johnson,…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- United States Postal Service Board of Governors v. AikensSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Furnco Construction Corp. v. WatersSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Pullman-Standard v. SwintSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.