Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Johnson v. Transportation Agency

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided December 4, 1984No. 83-1532Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partWallace, Circuit Judge

This “reverse discrimination” case presents some difficult questions arising from the application of an affirmative action plan. I conclude that the record before us is insufficient to make broad pronouncements of judicial policy. I would vacate and remand this case for two reasons. First, the record suggests that the *760district court improperly allocated the burdens of persuasion and production between the parties. Second, the court did not make sufficiently detailed findings on the plan to hold it invalid.

I

The facts of this case, referred to in part by the majority, are significant. Johnson,…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  3. United States Postal Service Board of Governors v. AikensSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  4. Furnco Construction Corp. v. WatersSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  5. Pullman-Standard v. SwintSupreme Court of the United States · 1982

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API