Legal Opinion

Harrell v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided November 8, 2017No. 4D17-1840Published

1Per curiam

Jesse Cleveland Harrell timely appeals the summary denial of a rule 3.850 motion. Below the state responded that Harrell’s August 5, 2016, motion was untimely filed under rule 3.850 and his claims of score-sheet error did not demonstrate entitlement to relief under rule 3.800(a). The trial court denied the motion based upon the state’s response.

On appeal, the state acknowledges that the August 2016 motion was timely filed within two years after the Florida Supreme Court declined jurisdiction to review Harrell’s direct appeal in Harrell v. State, 173 So.3d 962 (Fla. 2015). See, e.g., Leighty…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Leighty v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API