Legal Opinion · Dissent

Krueger v. Callies

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided June 22, 1973No. 38764Published

1Dissent

' Spencer, J.,

dissenting.

I respectfully dissent from the majority opinion herein for the following reasons: First. The land was not a homestead at the time of the sale. The evidence shows that the parties left the premises claimed as a homestead without any intention of returning to it for homestead purposes. An abandonment of the homestead right has been established. Phifer v. Miller (1951), 153 Neb. 748, 45 N. W. 2d 907.

Second. The deed took the contract out of the statute of frauds. Even if the property were a homestead, an unacknowledged contract for its sale would be valid where it is…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Farmers Investment Co. v. O'BrienNebraska Supreme Court · 1922
  2. Phifer v. MillerNebraska Supreme Court · 1951
  3. Musser v. ZurcherNebraska Supreme Court · 1966

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API