Legal Opinion

Nickolizack v. State

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided November 22, 1905No. 14,145PublishedCited by 13 opinions

Error to the district court for Holt county: James J. Harrington, Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtBarnes, J.

Joseph Nickolizack, who will hereafter be called the accused, was tried in the district court for Holt county on a charge of what is commonly called statutory rape, alleged to have been committed on the person of one Lena Kmicli, a female1 child under the age of fifteen years. He was found guilty and was sentenced to the penitentiary for a term of six years. From that judgment he brings the case here by a petition in error.

The record discloses that there were 39 assignments of error in the motion for a new trial, and 100 of such assignments in his petition. However, we will discuss only so…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. McAllister v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1901
  2. Carpenter v. LingenfelterNebraska Supreme Court · 1894
  3. Elliott v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1892
  4. McDuffie v. BentleyNebraska Supreme Court · 1889
  5. Morton v. CarlinNebraska Supreme Court · 1897

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Hosford v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 1988
  2. State v. FranklinNebraska Supreme Court · 1975
  3. Flege v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1913
  4. Swogger v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1928
  5. Ambrozi v. FryNebraska Supreme Court · 1954

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API