Legal Opinion

Conway v. County of Todd

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided October 28, 1932No. 28,993PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHolt, J.

Certiorari to review a decision of the industrial commission awarding compensation to respondent, as the widow of John M. Conway, who met death in the course of his employment from an accident arising out of the same.

The sole question presented is whether the evidence justified the finding of the commission that respondent “was wholly dependent upon” John M. Conway at the time of his death. Respondent is the widow of John M. Conway. G. S. 1923 (1 Mason, 1927) § 4275(1), reads:

“For the purpose of this act, the following described persons shall be conclusively presumed to be wholly dependent:…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Partee v. Memphis Concrete Pipe Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1927
  2. Hinchuk v. Swift & Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1921
  3. State ex rel. London & Lancashire Indemnity Co. v. District CourtSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1918
  4. State ex rel. George J. Grant Construction Co. v. District CourtSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1917
  5. Cambria Coal Co. v. DaughertyTennessee Supreme Court · 1930

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Koeppel v. E. I. duPont de Nemours & Co.Superior Court of Delaware · 1936
  2. Baburic v. Butler BrothersSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1951
  3. Harrison v. Cargill Commission Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1934
  4. Meyer v. AB McMahan CompanySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1964
  5. Olson v. Dahlin Jones Electric Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1934

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API