Legal Opinion

Tiernan v. County of Monroe

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided April 26, 1991PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Order unanimously reversed on the law with costs and motion granted. Memorandum: Plaintiff Yvonne Tiernan, as Limited Administratrix of the Estate of Mark Gorrow, contends that Supreme Court erred in denying her motion for partial summary judgment because defendant owner and defendant general contractor violated their duty under Labor Law § 240. We agree.

Decedent Gorrow was employed as a laborer dismantling the Driving Park Bridge when he fell approximately 70 feet from the bridge superstructure and sustained serious injuries. When decedent was reached by other workers after the accident, he…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Heath v. Soloff Construction, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
  2. Conway v. New York State Teachers' Retirement SystemAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
  3. Hayes v. Eastman Kodak Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Atwell v. Mountain Ltd.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
  2. Russell v. GainesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
  3. Seemueller v. County of ErieAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
  4. Spike v. Hollands' Lumber Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API