In re T.P.
Montana Supreme Court
1Concurrence
CHIEF JUSTICE GRAY,
specially concurring.
¶25 I concur in the Court’s resolution of this case, but only in limited portions of the Opinion. In my concurring opinion in G.M., ¶ 74 (Gray, C.J., concurring), I observed that-contrary to certain statements by the Court and the Dissent in that cas e-Mental Health ofL.C.B. addressed the inapplicability of the “criminal law exclusionary rule” to testimony and evidence admitted at a hearing, and did not state that a district court in an involuntary commitment proceeding may view all potentially relevant information in the universe. Here, I write…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Montana Environmental Information Center v. Montana Department of Environmental QualityMontana Supreme Court · 2005