Legal Opinion · Concurrence

In re T.P.

Montana Supreme Court

Decided August 4, 2008No. DA 06-0738Published

1Concurrence

CHIEF JUSTICE GRAY,

specially concurring.

¶25 I concur in the Court’s resolution of this case, but only in limited portions of the Opinion. In my concurring opinion in G.M., ¶ 74 (Gray, C.J., concurring), I observed that-contrary to certain statements by the Court and the Dissent in that cas e-Mental Health ofL.C.B. addressed the inapplicability of the “criminal law exclusionary rule” to testimony and evidence admitted at a hearing, and did not state that a district court in an involuntary commitment proceeding may view all potentially relevant information in the universe. Here, I write…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Montana Environmental Information Center v. Montana Department of Environmental QualityMontana Supreme Court · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API