Legal Opinion
Milliken & Co. v. Federal Trade Commission
District Court, D. South Carolina
Decided May 10, 1983No. 79-126-5PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER ON DEFENDANTS’ MOTIONS TO TRANSFER UNDER 28 U.S.C. § 1406(a) & 28 U.S.C. § 1404(a). NATURE OF PROCEEDING
HEMPHILL, Senior District Judge.
Defendants, by Motion(s) originally filed September 17, 1981, attack the venue 1 of this case as improperly laid (28 U.S.C. § 1406(a)) 2 in the District of South Carolina, and, alternatively, seeks discretionary (for the convenience of parties and witnesses, in the interest of justice) transfer under provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 1404(a). 3 This is the latest in a series of legal maneuverings which, commencing with the filing of the complaint on January 19,…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Neirbo Co. v. Bethlehem Shipbuilding Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1939
- Humphrey's v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
- Factors Etc., Inc. And Boxcar Enterprises Inc. v. Pro Arts, Inc. And Stop and Shop Companies, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1978
- Stafford v. BriggsSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Ford Motor Co. v. Ryan. Ferguson v. Ford Motor Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1950
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Seariver Maritime Financial Holdings, Inc. v. PenaDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 1996
- Eastern Scientific Marketing, Inc. v. Tekna-Seal, Inc.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 1988
- Phillips v. S. Gumpert Co., Inc.District Court, W.D. North Carolina · 1986
- Robinson v. EgnorDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 1988
- Flowers Industries, Inc. v. Federal Trade CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1987
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.