Legal Opinion
Didato v. Coniglio
New York Supreme Court
Decided April 15, 1906Published
Demubbeb to complaint.
1Opinion of the CourtBlanchard, J.
The complaint sets forth certain instruments, described by the plaintiff as promissory notes, as follows:
*281“ $1,030.00. Mew Yobk, , 190 . “ pay to the order of Eosario Didato, one thousand and thirty dollars. Value received and charge on account to 38 Stanton street.
" Laksa Eosalia,
“ Salvatobe Pampikella.”
“ $825. Mew Yobk, , 190 . “ pay to the order of Eosario Didato, eight hundred and twenty-five dollars. Value received and charge on account of to 38 Stanton street.
“Eosalia Cokiglio, “S. P. Cokiglio, “Atty.”
These instruments were executed and delivered by the defendants to the plaintiff, and…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Hegeman v. . MoonNew York Court of Appeals · 1892
- Keteltas v. . MyersNew York Court of Appeals · 1859
- Oishei v. CravenSuperior Court of Buffalo · 1895