Legal Opinion

Didato v. Coniglio

New York Supreme Court

Decided April 15, 1906Published

Demubbeb to complaint.

1Opinion of the CourtBlanchard, J.

The complaint sets forth certain instruments, described by the plaintiff as promissory notes, as follows:

*281“ $1,030.00. Mew Yobk, , 190 . “ pay to the order of Eosario Didato, one thousand and thirty dollars. Value received and charge on account to 38 Stanton street.
" Laksa Eosalia,
“ Salvatobe Pampikella.”
“ $825. Mew Yobk, , 190 . “ pay to the order of Eosario Didato, eight hundred and twenty-five dollars. Value received and charge on account of to 38 Stanton street.
“Eosalia Cokiglio, “S. P. Cokiglio, “Atty.”

These instruments were executed and delivered by the defendants to the plaintiff, and…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Hegeman v. . MoonNew York Court of Appeals · 1892
  2. Keteltas v. . MyersNew York Court of Appeals · 1859
  3. Oishei v. CravenSuperior Court of Buffalo · 1895

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API