People v. Hong Quin Moon
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Santa Cruz County, and from orders denying a motion in arrest of judgment, and denying a new trial. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court, and in the dissenting opinion of Justice Paterson.
1Opinion of the Court
The Court.
The defendant was charged with having obtained from one Dong Toy the sum of $150, by means of false and fraudulent pretenses and representations.
The information is sufficient, and there were no errors in the instructions of the court. The jury were instructed that before the defendant could be convicted it must be shown beyond a reasonable doubt that the representations alleged were false, and made with intent to defraud Dong Toy, and that they induced him to part with his money. Dong Toy did not testify that he believed the alleged statement of the defendant, or that it induced him…
2Cited by13 opinions
- People v. GordonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1945
- People v. SmithCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984
- People v. SchmittCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1957
- People v. SteffnerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1924
- People v. MartinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1957
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.