Legal Opinion

Wall v. Gillin Printing Co.

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Decided November 15, 1897PublishedCited by 3 opinions

■ Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the justice of the Third District Court in favor of the plaintiff for sixty-one dollars and eighty-five cents ($61,85) damages, besides costs.

1Opinion of the CourtDaly, P. J.

The plaintiff has recovered $61'.85, a balance claimed for the use of a lithographic printing press, and for work and material furnished for the printing of certain maps, for defendant. The answer offsets damages for imperfect printing, for delay,, and for damage to a lithographing stone, greater than the amount of plaintiff’s claim; and also avers payment in full.

All the issues raised by the pleadings were tried, and the finding was in plaintiff’s favor upon evidence which, if it did not conclusively establish the merits of plaintiff’s case, was at least so conflicting as to afford no…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Wintringham v. . HayesNew York Court of Appeals · 1894

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Murray v. Paramount Petroleum Products Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1924
  2. Otto Gerdau Co. v. Bowne-Morton's Stores, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1955
  3. Sevier County Bank v. StateCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1933

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API