Legal Opinion

People v. Kurtz

New York Court of Common Pleas

Decided May 7, 1890PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Application to discharge a judgment on a forfeited recognizance.

1Per curiam

The principal was indicted on the 25th of October, 1888, for the crime of grand lareency, and for criminally receiving stolen property. He was arrested and on the 23d of November, 1888, he, Together with the surety, entered into a recognizance in the sum of $1,500 for his appearance to answer the indictment. The case was on the calendar of the court of general sessions on the 11th of April, 1889, when the principal failed to appear, and the surety did not produce him according to the terms of the recognizance, which was thereupon forfeited, and afterwards judgment duly entered upon such…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. People v. BlankmanNew York Supreme Court · 1837
  2. People v. FieldsNew York Court of Common Pleas · 1876

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. People v. AbramsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1916
  2. People v. PuglieseNew York Supreme Court · 1913

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API