Legal Opinion
VIP OF BERLIN, LLC v. Town of Berlin
District Court, D. Connecticut
Decided July 8, 2009No. Civil Action 3:06cv1811 (SRU)PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RULING ON MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION
STEFAN R. UNDERHILL, District Judge.
Plaintiff VIP of Berlin, LLC (“VIP”) seeks a preliminary injunction enjoining the defendant Town of Berlin (“Berlin”) and its agents, officers, and representatives from enforcing the definition of “adult oriented store” contained in Berlin Code of Ordinances § 14-242 against VIP to prohibit the operation of a general retail store at VIP’s premises in Berlin. VIP contends that the language of Berlin’s sexually oriented business (“SOB”) ordinance, which defines any retail establishment having “a substantial or…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Elrod v. BurnsSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Hoffman Estates v. Flipside, Hoffman Estates, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Roth v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- VIP OF BERLIN, LLC v. Town of BerlinCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2010
- Keepers, Inc. v. City of MilfordDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2013
- VIP OF BERLIN, LLC v. Town of BerlinCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2010