Legal Opinion

Delsman v. Wilcox

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided July 7, 1925PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCoshow, J.

A lien upon the property of a judgment debtor exists by authority of the statute. The lien is not created by the judgment entry in the court journal nor the pronouncement of the court, but by the entry in the judgment docket: Section 205, Or. L.; Western Sav. Co. v. Currey, 39 Or. 407 (65 Pac. 360, 87 Am. St. Rep. 660); Stannis v. Nicholson, 2 Or. 332. The lien of the judgment of plaintiff against the defendant Wilcox, created by the re-entry in the judgment docket on January 12, 1912, therefore expired on January 12, 1922, unless the language in the order made on that date operates to…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. McAfee v. ReynoldsIndiana Supreme Court · 1891
  2. Stannis v. NicholsonOregon Supreme Court · 1868
  3. Howe v. KernOregon Supreme Court · 1912
  4. Sabin v. KynistonOregon Supreme Court · 1916
  5. Western Savings Co. v. CurreyOregon Supreme Court · 1901

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Stephens v. StephensOregon Supreme Court · 1942
  2. In re StaplesDistrict Court, N.D. Oklahoma · 1932

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API