Legal Opinion
Fed. Deposit Ins. Corp. v. Pérez
United States District Court
Decided July 11, 2018No. Civil No. 15–2590 (FAB)PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
BESOSA, District Judge.
Plaintiff Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, as receiver for Doral Bank ("Doral") ("FDIC-R") filed a second motion to dismiss counterclaims filed by defendants Walter Rafael Pedreira-Pérez ("Pedreira"), María de Lourdes Blázquez-Arzuaga ("Blázquez"), and the conjugal partnership constituted by them (collectively, "defendants") pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure Rule 12(b)(1) (" Rule 12(b)(1)"). (Docket No. 23.) Id. For the reasons set forth below, the Court GRANTS the FDIC-R's motion to dismiss the counterclaims, with prejudice. (Docket No. 23.)
I. Background
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Arbaugh v. Y & H Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2006
- O'Melveny & Myers v. Federal Deposit InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Jamie Viqueira v. First BankCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1998
- Merlonghi v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2010
- Serge Marquis v. Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, as Liquidating Agent of Hillsborough Bank & Trust Company, Eltrex International Corporation v. Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, as Liquidating Agent of Hillsborough Bank & Trust Company, Michael M. Mills v. Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, as Receiver for Nashua Trust Company, James P. Goodrich v. Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, as Receiver for Dartmouth BankCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1992
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Benítez-Rodríguez v. Fed. Deposit Ins. Corp.United States District Court · 2019