Christie v. Slinginger
Indiana Supreme Court
Prom Morgan Circuit Court; Nathan A. Whitaker, Judge. Action by Joseph Slinginger against Thomas J. Christie and another. Prom a judgment for plaintiff, the defendant appeals. (Transferred from the Appellate Court under §1405 Burns 1914, Acts 1901 p. 590.)
1Opinion of the CourtSpencer, C. J.
— This action was to have a judgment can-celled and vacated as being fraudulent. The sole question assigned as error, is the overruling- of appellants’ demurrer for insufficient facts, to the appellee’s complaint.
There is no question presented; the appellants by their brief have wholly ignored Rule 22 of this court; it fails to set out the complaint or the substance thereof; it contains no statement of “Propositions or Points” and authorities *659relied on. Such, disregard of rules precludes consideration of the question. Judgment affirmed.
Note. — Reported in 110 N. E. 61. See, also, 3 C. J.…
2Cited by3 opinions
- Harvey v. FrenchIndiana Supreme Court · 1915
- Mesmer v. EglandIndiana Supreme Court · 1926
- Shay v. GoinsIndiana Court of Appeals · 1918