Legal Opinion

Duggins v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided September 17, 2014No. 3D14-1871Published

1Opinion of the CourtLogue, J.

This case comes before us in the unusual posture in which both the defendant, Michael Duggins, and the State petition for mandamus to require the trial court to rule on Duggins’s pending motions to suppress. We grant Duggins’s petition.

Duggins was charged in November 2012 with aggravated assault and possession of a firearm by a convicted felon. He filed two separate motions to suppress physical evidence. The trial court conducted an evidentiary hearing on the motions on June 23, 2014. During the hearing, Dug-gins’s counsel advised the court that Dug-gins has been incarcerated for over 600…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Flagship Nat. Bank of Miami v. TestaDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1983
  2. Quintana v. BaradDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1988
  3. State v. EmbrySupreme Court of Florida · 1975
  4. SR Acquisitions—Florida City, LLC v. San Remo Homes at Florida City, LLCDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2011
  5. Williams v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API