Berkman v. Ross
Massachusetts District Court, Appellate Division
1Per curiam
This action of contract was based upon a lease executed by two partners as lessors and the defendant as lessee. The action was brought in the name of one of the lessors.
The trial judge denied a requested ruling to the effect that there must be a finding for the defendant because of the non-joinder of both lessors as parties plaintiff. This ruling was erroneous. Thomas v. Benson, 264 Mass. 555.. It is ordered that the finding for the plaintiff he vacated and a finding and judgment entered for the defendant.
*191Britton v. Goodman, 235 Mass. 471, 475:
“A contract by co-partners within the scope of…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Old Dominion Copper Mining & Smelting Co. v. BigelowMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1909
- Holton v. American Pastry Products Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1931
- Corey v. HavenerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1902
- Hart v. FitzgeraldMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1807
- Proctor v. DillonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1920
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.