Legal Opinion

Berkman v. Ross

Massachusetts District Court, Appellate Division

Decided June 29, 1964No. 100511Published

1Per curiam

This action of contract was based upon a lease executed by two partners as lessors and the defendant as lessee. The action was brought in the name of one of the lessors.

The trial judge denied a requested ruling to the effect that there must be a finding for the defendant because of the non-joinder of both lessors as parties plaintiff. This ruling was erroneous. Thomas v. Benson, 264 Mass. 555.. It is ordered that the finding for the plaintiff he vacated and a finding and judgment entered for the defendant.

*191Britton v. Goodman, 235 Mass. 471, 475:

“A contract by co-partners within the scope of…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Old Dominion Copper Mining & Smelting Co. v. BigelowMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1909
  2. Holton v. American Pastry Products Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1931
  3. Corey v. HavenerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1902
  4. Hart v. FitzgeraldMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1807
  5. Proctor v. DillonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1920

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API