Legal Opinion

Buxton v. Ainsworth

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided June 27, 1908No. Docket No. 5PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Error to Ionia; Miner, J., presiding. Case by James Buxton against Thomas Ainsworth for personal injuries. There was judgment for plaintiff, and defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtMontgomery, J.

This is an action to recover damages resulting from an injury suffered in a collision between vehicles driven by plaintiff and defendant respectively. The case has once had the attention of this court, and is reported at length in 138 Mich .532, where the facts are fully stated. The facts appearing upon the second trial do not differ very materially from those given in the reported case, and except as noted in the discussion of the several exceptions taken, it will not be necessary to advert to the testimony. There are a large number of assignments of error, some of which are not discussed.…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. McQuisten v. Detroit Citizens' Street-Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1907
  2. Shall v. Detroit & Mackinac Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1908

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Bouma v. DuboisMichigan Supreme Court · 1912
  2. People v. LipsczinskaMichigan Supreme Court · 1920
  3. Symons v. BurtonIndiana Court of Appeals · 1925
  4. Bird v. Detroit Trust Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1935

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API