Legal Opinion
Ginsberg, Mayor v. Ky. Utilities Co.
Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)
Decided May 7, 1935PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion op the 'Court by
¡Creal, Commissioner—
Reversing.
Middlesboro is a city of the third class and has for some years been operating nnder the commission form of government. On July 27, 1932, the board of commissioners of the city, pursuant to chapter 119, Acts of 1932 (Kentucky Statutes 1933 Supp., secs. 3480d-l to 3480d-22, enacted an ordinance providing for the construction of a municipally owned electrical generating plant and distribution system to be financed by the sale pf 6 per cent, bonds in the sum of $300,000, which were- not to be a direct obligation of the city, bnt were to be…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Deming v. BradstreetSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1912
- In Re StrathamCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1920
- State ex rel. Megnella v. MeiningSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1916
- Weston v. John L. Roper Lumber Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1912
- Louisville & N. R. R. v. MillerCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1902
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- John B. Stetson Co. v. Stephen L. Stetson Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1942
- Hitchins v. Mayor of CumberlandCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1958
- Eagle v. City of CorbinCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1938
- Utah Power & Light Co. v. Ogden CityUtah Supreme Court · 1938
- Carpenter v. Riverton CityUtah Supreme Court · 2004
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.