Legal Opinion

State v. Wixom

Court of Appeals of Iowa

Decided April 30, 1999No. 97-2042PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtStreit, J.

Michael Wixom appeals his convictions and sentences, following a jury trial, for three drug-related offenses. Because the State impermissibly impeached one of its own witnesses in order to offer otherwise inadmissible hearsay into evidence, we reverse.

I. Background Facts & Proceedings.

On October 8, 1996, Wixom’s residence was searched pursuant to a warrant. The police found drugs and drug paraphernalia. Wixom was charged with possession with intent to deliver cocaine, possession with intent to deliver marijuana, and possession with intent to deliver or manufacture amphetamine.

At trial,…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. State v. PetersonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1974
  2. State v. HallumSupreme Court of Iowa · 1998
  3. State v. TurecekSupreme Court of Iowa · 1990
  4. State v. RossSupreme Court of Iowa · 1998
  5. State v. BugelySupreme Court of Iowa · 1997

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. State v. MooreheadSupreme Court of Iowa · 2005
  2. State of Iowa v. Yarvon Nathaniel RussellSupreme Court of Iowa · 2017
  3. Shinn v. Iowa Mutual Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Iowa · 2000
  4. Amended June 26, 2017 State of Iowa v. Yarvon Nathaniel RussellSupreme Court of Iowa · 2017
  5. Randy Alan Zaabel, Applicant-Appellant v. State of IowaCourt of Appeals of Iowa · 2016

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API