Legal Opinion

Princess Hotels International, Inc. v. Superior Court

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 28, 1995No. A066506PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

PETERSON. P. J.

In this case, we hold that a hotel has no duty to warn its guests of a dangerous condition of adjacent property over which the hotel has no control, to wit, the ocean currents.

Petitioner Princess Hotels International, Inc. (Princess) is a defendant in an action for personal injuries and wrongful death brought by real parties Linda L. Pearson and the estate of her deceased former husband, Robin H. Pearson. Linda Pearson was seriously injured and Robin Pearson was killed when the two went swimming in the ocean adjacent to their Acapulco hotel. Their complaint alleges the…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Isaacs v. Huntington Memorial HospitalCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Fuhrer v. Gearhart by the Sea, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1988
  3. Perkins v. ByrnesSupreme Court of Missouri · 1954
  4. Norma Tarshis v. Lahaina Investment Corporation, a Hawaii Corporation, D/B/A Royal Lahaina HotelCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1973
  5. Seaber v. Hotel Del CoronadoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1991

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Alcaraz v. VeceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1997
  2. Pacheco v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
  3. Poleyeff v. Seville Beach Hotel Corp.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2001
  4. Alcaraz v. VeceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1997
  5. Alcaraz v. VeceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1997

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API