Legal Opinion

Hatcher & Co. v. First National Bank of Mechanicsburg

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided February 6, 1888PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Practice in Superior Court. Discovery. Interrogatories. Notice. Corporations. Witness. Before Judge Harris; City Court of Macon. June Term, 1887. Reported in the decision.

1Opinion of the Court

Bleckley, Chief Justice.

The defendant in error was an incorporated bank of Pennsylvania, and brought action against Hatcher & Company upon a negotiable instrument, payable to and indorsed by the Taylor Manufacturing Company. Hatcher & Company made a defence that perhaps would have been good against the payees of the note, but not good against the plaintiffs in the action, unless they could be. affected *540with notice of the defence. For the purpose of proving such notice, Hatcher & Company took the evidence of the cashier of the bank; and when the case was called for trial, their counsel made a…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. Old Dominion Power Co.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1945
  2. RICHMOND CONCRETE &C. CO., INC. v. WardCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1957
  3. Lee v. HightowerCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1907

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API