Legal Opinion

Vanatta v. Barnhart

District Court, D. Kansas

Decided July 30, 2004No. 03-4217-JARPublished

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM & ORDER

ROBINSON, District Judge.

Plaintiff Randy Vanatta brings this action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) seeking judicial review of Defendant Commissioner of Social Security’s denial of his application for a period of disability and disability insurance benefits under Title II of the Social Security Act (Act) and supplemental security income under Title XVI of the Act. According to plaintiff, defendant failed to properly assess plaintiffs credibility and erroneously determined plaintiffs residual functional capacity and resulting ability to work. As explained in more detail below,…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Bowen v. YuckertSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  2. Glen W. WILLIAMS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Otis R. BOWEN, M.D., Secretary of Health and Human Services, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1988
  3. William T. WINFREY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Shirley S. CHATER, Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1996
  4. Ramona KEPLER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Shirley S. CHATER, Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1995
  5. Luna v. BowenCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1987

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API