Edward v. State

JOHNSON, Presiding Judge.

After being tried by a judge sitting without a jury, Isaac Edward, Jr. was found guilty of burglary. He appeals from the conviction, challenging the sufficiency of the evidence and claiming that there was a fatal variance between the allegations of the indictment and the evidence produced at trial. Neither claim has merit, so we affirm the conviction.

1. Edward contends that the evidence of his guilt was purely circumstantial, and that the trial judge should have believed the co-defendant’s trial testimony that Edward was not involved in the commission of the crime.…