Legal Opinion

Farden v. Farden

New Jersey Court of Chancery

Decided November 2, 1935Published

1Opinion of the Court

Here, A. M.

The petition praj^s for a decree of divorce a vinculo on the ground of adultery, the charge being that the defendant on *607December 5th, 6th, 7th, 8th, 9th, 10th, 11th, 12th and 13th, 1931, committed adultery “at some place unknown to your petitioner with a person whose name is unknown to petitioner and whom petitioner is unable to describe,” and that thereafter the defendant became ill and was discovered to be suffering “from a sudden acute fresh attack of a vile and loathsome venereal disease, which disease she acquired and contracted through her adulterous relations between the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Danielly v. DaniellyNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1922
  2. Hill v. HillNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1925
  3. Thornton v. ThorntonNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1904

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API