Legal Opinion

Morrow v. State

Alabama Court of Appeals

Decided April 3, 1923No. 8 Div. 52PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The granting of a continuance in the trial of a criminal case is within the discretion of the trial judge, and his decision will not be distributed unless it appear that the discretion was abused. Sanders v. State, 181 Ala. 35, 61 So. 336; Gilbert v. State, 2 Ala. App. 94, 57 So. 127; Sanderson v. State, 168 Ala. 109, 53 So. 109; Castona v. State, 17 Ala. App. 421,84 So. 871.

Where a crime is shown to have been committed in a certain house, and the tracks of human beings are found near the house, it is competent to show, and a witness may testify, in which direction the tracks were going, if…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Levison v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1875
  2. Burton v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1896
  3. Sanders v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1913
  4. Sanderson v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1910
  5. Baalam v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1850

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Dickey v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1946
  2. Ham v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1925
  3. Hubbard v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1950
  4. Gray v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1924
  5. Zorn v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1924

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API