Legal Opinion

Dickerson v. Wason

New York Supreme Court

Decided April 1, 1867PublishedCited by 3 opinions

EXCEPTIONS ordered to be heard at the general term, in the first instance.

1Opinion of the Court

By the Court, Ingraham, J.

The judge, upon the trial, after submitting questions of fact to the jury, who found for the plaintiff, directed that the exceptions be heard in the first instance at the general term, and suspended judgment. It must be apparent therefore that on this hearing we have nothing to do with the findings of fact; and even if they were erroneous, we could pot now interfere to correct them. In fact, the judge at the circuit cannot direct a case to be reserved and heard at the general term in the first instance if there are questions of fact to be examined. (Cronk v.…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Purchase v. . MattesonNew York Court of Appeals · 1862
  2. Cobb v. . CornishNew York Court of Appeals · 1858
  3. Cronk v. CanfieldNew York Supreme Court · 1857
  4. Warner v. . LeeNew York Court of Appeals · 1852

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Niagara Fire Insurance v. ForehandIllinois Supreme Court · 1897
  2. Hoxie v. GreeneNew York Supreme Court · 1869
  3. Dickerson v. WasonNew York Supreme Court · 1869

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API