Legal Opinion
State v. Rose
Supreme Court of Louisiana
Decided March 1, 1920No. 23877PublishedCited by 33 opinions
Appeal from Criminal District Court, Parish of Orleans; Arthur Landry, Judge. Lew Rose was convicted of maintaining a disorderly house, and he appeals.
1Opinion of the CourtO’Niell, J.
The defendant appeals from a conviction, and a sentence of fine and imprisonment, on an indictment charging:
“That one Lew Rose, late of the parish of Orleans on the 8th 'day of October, 1919, in the parish of Orleans aforesaid, * * •* did then and there unlawfully keep a house of public entertainment at the municipal number 318 Dauphine street, in the city of New Orleans, in which he did then and there permit lewd dancing, he, the said Lew Rose, being then and there the manager of the said house of public entertainment, which said house of entertainment is commonly known as the Dauphine…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- State v. GasterSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1893
- State v. ComeauxSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1913
- State ex rel. Mioton v. BakerSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1904
- City of Shreveport v. WilsonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1919
- State ex rel. Etie v. FosterSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1904
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by33 opinions
- State v. LaundyOregon Supreme Court · 1922
- State v. TrubySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1947
- State v. EdwardsSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1972
- Briggs v. North Muskegon Police DepartmentDistrict Court, W.D. Michigan · 1983
- State v. SaiboldSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1948
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.