Dawson v. Department of Transportation
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Carley, Presiding Judge.
After appellee-condemnor condemned a portion of a tract pursuant to OCGA § 32-3-1 et seq., appellant-condemnees appealed and the issue of just and adequate compensation was brought to trial before a jury. At trial, condemnor’s expert gave his opinion as to the value of that portion of condemnees’ tract that had been taken and as to the consequential damages to the remainder. At the close of condemnees’ evidence, condemnor moved for a directed verdict in the amounts to which its expert had testified. Condemnor’s motion was granted and condemnees appeal from the judgment…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Lewis v. State Highway DepartmentCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1964
- Department of Transportation v. BrooksCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1980
- Department of Transportation v. WillisCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1983
- Department of Transportation v. AdamsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1989
- Gaines v. Department of TransportationCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1976
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Walkenhorst v. State, Department of RoadsNebraska Supreme Court · 1998
- Gunn v. Department of TransportationCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1996
- Lee v. City of AtlantaCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1995
- Department of Transportation v. MettsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1993
- Pendarvis Construction Corp. v. Cobb County-Marietta Water AuthorityCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1999
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.