Legal Opinion · Dissent

In re George

New York Court of Appeals

Decided December 10, 2013Published

1DissentPigott, J.

The misconduct of which Judge George is accused does not warrant the sanction of removal from office. “Removal is an extreme sanction and should be imposed only in the event of truly egregious circumstances. Indeed, we have indicated that removal should not be ordered for conduct that amounts simply to poor judgment, or even extremely poor judgment” (Matter of Cunningham, 57 NY2d 270, 275 [1982] [citations omitted]).

Here, there is no allegation of any legal error made by Judge George in dismissing the summons in question. No one disputes that the ticket issued to Lynn Johnson for a seat belt…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Matter of WatsonNew York Court of Appeals · 2003
  2. In re CunninghamNew York Court of Appeals · 1982
  3. In re KileyNew York Court of Appeals · 1989
  4. Matter of SkinnerNew York Court of Appeals · 1997
  5. In re CohenNew York Court of Appeals · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API