Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Richard v. Seidner

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided April 2, 1997No. 1996-1245Published

1Opinion of the Court

[This opinion has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 78 Ohio St.3d 116.] THE STATE EX REL. RICHARD, APPELLANT, v. SEIDNER, WARDEN, APPELLEE. [Cite as State ex rel. Richard v. Seidner,

1997-Ohio-230.) Civil procedure—Motion for relief from judgment—Court of appeals does not abuse its discretion in denying a Civ.R. 60(B) motion without conducting an evidentiary hearing, when—Habeas corpus not available to challenge either the validity or the sufficiency of an indictment. (No. 96-1245—Submitted February 18, 1997—Decided April 2, 1997.) APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Lorain County,…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Richard v. SeidnerOhio Supreme Court · 1996
  2. State ex rel. Durkin v. UngaroOhio Supreme Court · 1988
  3. Southern Ohio Coal Co. v. KidneyOhio Court of Appeals · 1995
  4. State ex rel. Richard v. SeidnerOhio Supreme Court · 1996
  5. State ex rel. Richard v. SeidnerOhio Supreme Court · 1997

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API