Paton v. Paton
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
[This decision has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 91 Ohio St.3d 94.] PATON, N.K.A. SAXTON, APPELLEE, v. PATON ET AL.; ALLEN COUNTY CHILD SUPPORT ENFORCEMENT AGENCY, APPELLANT. [Cite as Paton v. Paton,
2001-Ohio-291.] Domestic relations—Supplemental security income benefits received by disabled child do not constitute a financial resource of the child pursuant to R.C. 3113.215(B)(3)(f) for purposes of justifying a trial court’s deviation from the basic child support schedule. (No. 99-848—Submitted December 12, 2000—Decided March 7, 2001.) APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Allen…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Marker v. GrimmOhio Supreme Court · 1992
- Oatley v. OatleyOhio Court of Appeals · 1977
- Paton v. PatonOhio Supreme Court · 2001
- Hollister v. WhalenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
- Williams v. WilliamsOhio Supreme Court · 2000
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Dawson v. Dawson, Unpublished Decision (1-30-2006)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2006