Legal Opinion

Paton v. Paton

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided March 6, 2001No. 1999-0848PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

[This decision has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 91 Ohio St.3d 94.] PATON, N.K.A. SAXTON, APPELLEE, v. PATON ET AL.; ALLEN COUNTY CHILD SUPPORT ENFORCEMENT AGENCY, APPELLANT. [Cite as Paton v. Paton,

2001-Ohio-291.] Domestic relations—Supplemental security income benefits received by disabled child do not constitute a financial resource of the child pursuant to R.C. 3113.215(B)(3)(f) for purposes of justifying a trial court’s deviation from the basic child support schedule. (No. 99-848—Submitted December 12, 2000—Decided March 7, 2001.) APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Allen…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Marker v. GrimmOhio Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Oatley v. OatleyOhio Court of Appeals · 1977
  3. Paton v. PatonOhio Supreme Court · 2001
  4. Hollister v. WhalenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
  5. Williams v. WilliamsOhio Supreme Court · 2000

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Dawson v. Dawson, Unpublished Decision (1-30-2006)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API