Thurman v. State
Court of Appeals of Georgia
Conviction of manslaughter; from Jones superior court — Judge James B. Park. December 15, 1913.
1Opinion of the CourtWade, J.
1. Generally it is immaterial how a threat was communicated; the question of importance is, was it actually received by the party against whom it was directed?
2. Where evidence tending to show a conspiracy was admitted by the court, over objection as to its relevancy, under , an agreement of the State’s attorney to connect it with other evidence or establish such relevancy later, it was not error for the judge to fail afterwards to exclude the testimony, though there was a failure to connect it or show its relevancy as promised, there being no subsequent motion to.exclude it for this reason.…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Coffin v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
- Stone v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1903
- Reddick v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1912
- Lindsay v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1912
- Butts v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1913
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Payne v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1974
- Hill v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1946
- Futch v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1978
- Thrasher v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1943
- Quinn v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1918
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.