Legal Opinion

Cowart v. McDaris

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided January 11, 1943No. 29858PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtBroyles, C. J.

1. “The question of the value of an article is peculiarly for the jury, and that body is not absolutely bound by the opinions or estimates of the witness on that subject.” Minchew v. Nahunta Lumber Co., 5 Ga. App. 154 (4) (62 S. E. 716); Westberry v. Hand, 19 Ga. App. 529, 530 (91 S. E. 930). “Jurors are not required to accept as correct the uncontradicted opinion or estimate of a witness as to the value of property, and may by their verdict place a lower value upon the property.” Westberry v. Hand, supra; Johnson v. Stevens, 19 Ga. App. 192 (2) (91 S. E. 220), and cit.; Georgia Northern Ry.…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Georgia Northern Railway Co. v. BattleCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1918
  2. Minchew v. Nahunta Lumber Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1908
  3. Johnson v. StevensCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1917
  4. Westberry v. HandCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1917
  5. Lee v. BrandenburgCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1924

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Cowart v. McLarinCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1952

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API