Legal Opinion

Fiebinger v. City of New York

New York Supreme Court

Decided January 17, 1944PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSteinbrink, J.

Plaintiff moves for an examination before trial of the defendant Brown as an adverse party. The complaint alleges that plaintiff’s injuries were sustained as a result of the negligent operation by the defendant Brown of a trolley car owned and controlled by the defendant City of New York. The motion is opposed solely on the ground that the plaintiff has failed to serve on the defendant Brown a notice of claim and intention to sue in accordance with the provisions of section 50-c of the General Municipal Law, it being argued that by reason of this omission the action against the defendant…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. In Re Board of Rapid Transit RailroadNew York Court of Appeals · 1909
  2. Litchfield Construction Co. v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1926
  3. Ottmann v. Village of Rockville CentreNew York Court of Appeals · 1937

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. McGuire v. City of New YorkNew York Supreme Court · 1956
  2. Opn. No., New York Attorney General Reports1980

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API