Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Shields

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 31, 1977No. 1045PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HOFFMAN, Judge:

Appellant contends that he should be discharged because he was not brought to trial within 270 days as mandated by Rule 1100, Pa.R.Crim.P., 19 P.S. Appendix.

Appellant was arrested in connection with a June 26, 1974 rape that took place on North 22nd Street in Philadelphia. The magistrate issued the criminal complaint on June 27, 1974. Thus, the Commonwealth had 270 days in which to bring appellant to trial. Rule 1100(a). After numerous listings, the case had still not come to trial on May 21, 1975, when the lower court heard and denied appellant’s petition to dismiss filed…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. SheltonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
  2. Commonwealth v. MayfieldSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
  3. Commonwealth v. MyrickSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
  4. Commonwealth v. HicksonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
  5. Commonwealth v. ColemanSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1976

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. WadeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
  2. Commonwealth v. MancusoSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
  3. Commonwealth v. BrownSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
  4. Commonwealth v. KrasnerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
  5. Commonwealth v. GarnettSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1978

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API