Legal Opinion · Dissent

LoDico v. Caputi

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided July 10, 1987Published

1Dissent

Green, J. (dissenting).

I must dissent. The sole ground alleged on behalf of defendant Caputi’s motion to dismiss plaintiff’s complaint (see, CPLR 3211 [a] [7]) is that there was no physician-patient relationship between the defendant and the injured plaintiff at the time of the alleged medical malpractice. This claim is based upon defendant’s assertion that an examination by a physician at the request of an insurance carrier or workers’ compensation carrier does not constitute examination for treatment and, absent physical injury committed in the performance of the examination, is not enough…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Pike v. . HonsingerNew York Court of Appeals · 1898
  2. Cohn v. Lionel Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1968
  3. Twitchell v. MacKayAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1980
  4. Dubois v. . DeckerNew York Court of Appeals · 1891
  5. Lodico v. CohnNew York Supreme Court · 1986

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API