United States v. Gabriel Watters
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
WALLACE, Senior Circuit Judge:
Watters appeals from his conviction for making a false statement and obstruction of justice under 18 U.S.C. §§ 1001 and 1512(c). In a separately filed unpublished disposition we consider most of Watters’s claims. In this opinion we deal only with his claim that the district court gave an erroneous instruction on 18 U.S.C. § 1512(c). We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 and we affirm.
I
On April 29, 2009, Watters was indicted on nineteen counts of conspiracy, transportation of stolen vehicles, and sale or receipt of stolen vehicles under 18 U.S.C. §§…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Arthur Andersen LLP v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
- United States v. Hakeem Abdul Rasheed, AKA Clifford Jones, United States of America v. Janice PhillipsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1981
- United States v. Raymond J. RyanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1972
- United States v. AwadCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
- United States v. Anaya-AcostaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
3Cited by7 opinions
- United States v. David LonichCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2022
- United States v. Thomas RobertsonCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2023
- United States v. AndriesDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2022
- United States v. Leroy BacaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2019
- United States v. MontgomeryDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2021
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.