Legal Opinion

United States v. Gabriel Watters

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided June 5, 2013No. 11-10362PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

WALLACE, Senior Circuit Judge:

Watters appeals from his conviction for making a false statement and obstruction of justice under 18 U.S.C. §§ 1001 and 1512(c). In a separately filed unpublished disposition we consider most of Watters’s claims. In this opinion we deal only with his claim that the district court gave an erroneous instruction on 18 U.S.C. § 1512(c). We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 and we affirm.

I

On April 29, 2009, Watters was indicted on nineteen counts of conspiracy, transportation of stolen vehicles, and sale or receipt of stolen vehicles under 18 U.S.C. §§…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Arthur Andersen LLP v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
  2. United States v. Hakeem Abdul Rasheed, AKA Clifford Jones, United States of America v. Janice PhillipsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1981
  3. United States v. Raymond J. RyanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1972
  4. United States v. AwadCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
  5. United States v. Anaya-AcostaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. United States v. David LonichCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2022
  2. United States v. Thomas RobertsonCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2023
  3. United States v. AndriesDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2022
  4. United States v. Leroy BacaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2019
  5. United States v. MontgomeryDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2021

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API