Legal Opinion

Rosmor Realty Corp. v. Caviness

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Decided June 6, 1946PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

Memorandum The petition does not state facts conferring jurisdiction in this proceeding. It fails to allege facts to show the alleged breach and the commission of a nuisance. It also fails to allege that the notice required by paragraph (3) of subdivision (a) of section 6 of the Rent Regulation for Housing-in the New York City Defense-Rental Area (8 Federal Register 13918) has been served (Shelton Management Corp. v. Rosenkrants, 184 Misc. 355; Gilroy v. Becker, 186 Mise. 93).

The final order should be reversed, with $30 costs, and petition dismissed, with costs, without prejudice to a new…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Shelton Management Corp. v. RosenkrantzNew York Supreme Court · 1945

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Rosmor Realty Corp. v. CavinessCity of New York Municipal Court · 1946

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API