Legal Opinion

Sayer v. Williams

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided July 29, 1998No. 97-66PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TAYLOR, Justice.

Finding that appellant failed to provide expert testimony to establish proximate cause in her medical malpractice case, the district court granted appellee’s motion for judgment as a matter of law. Appellant brings this appeal arguing that her ease is an extraordinary one which does not require expert testimony to prove that her injuries were caused by the doctor’s medical negligence. We affirm.

I. ISSUE

Appellant, Betty I. Sayer (Sayer), states one issue:

The trial court erred in granting the appellee’s motion for directed verdict at the end of the appellant’s case in chief…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Harris v. GrizzleWyoming Supreme Court · 1981
  2. Mize v. North Big Horn Hospital DistrictWyoming Supreme Court · 1997
  3. Del Rossi v. DoenzWyoming Supreme Court · 1996
  4. Harvey v. First National Bank of PowellWyoming Supreme Court · 1996

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Dewey v. WentlandWyoming Supreme Court · 2002
  2. Sundown, Inc. v. Pearson Real Estate Co.Wyoming Supreme Court · 2000
  3. Armstrong v. HrabalWyoming Supreme Court · 2004
  4. Conner v. BOARD OF COUNTY COM'RS, NATRONAWyoming Supreme Court · 2002
  5. Glenn v. Union Pacific RailroadWyoming Supreme Court · 2011

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API