In Re Marriage of Lord

PRESIDING JUSTICE SEIDENFELD

delivered the opinion of the court:

Robert Lord appeals from a supplemental judgment entered in a dissolution-of-marriage proceeding. He contends that the trial judge abused his discretion in reserving maintenance until March 1985, erred in distribution of the marital property, and erred in ruling on attorney fees.

I

A preliminary question, which has not been raised by the parties, is whether the judgment reserving maintenance is appealable. Our analysis of' the recent supreme court case of In re Marriage of Leopando (1983), 96 Ill. 2d 114, is central to this.

Leopando…