Legal Opinion

Staples v. Merck & Co., Inc.

District Court, N.D. Texas

Decided July 1, 2003No. 3:03-cv-00180PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Memorandum Opinion and Order

LYNN, District Judge.

A number of cases, separately removed, were consolidated into this ease. In each Notice of Removal and/or Amended Notice of Removal, Defendant Merck alleged that jurisdiction is proper in this Court because Plaintiffs fraudulently joined two Texas defendants: Dr. Harvey Resnick, M.D., and R/D Clinical Research, Incorporated (collectively, “Clinical Researchers”). If the Clinical Researchers were not fraudulently joined, then this case is non-removable under 28 U.S.C. § 1441(b). In December 2002, the Plaintiffs filed ten actions in multiple…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. American Tobacco Co., Inc. v. GrinnellTexas Supreme Court · 1997
  2. Great Plains Trust Co. v. Morgan Stanley Dean Witter & Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2002
  3. Greater Houston Transportation Co. v. PhillipsTexas Supreme Court · 1991
  4. Torrington Co. v. StutzmanTexas Supreme Court · 2001
  5. Ernst & Young, L.L.P. v. Pacific Mutual Life Insurance Co.Texas Supreme Court · 2001

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Moreno Energy, Inc. v. Marathon Oil Co.District Court, S.D. Texas · 2012
  2. Elmazouni v. Mylan, Inc.District Court, N.D. Texas · 2016
  3. Cantor v. WACHOVIA MORTGAGE, FSBDistrict Court, N.D. Texas · 2009
  4. Betts v. Eli Lilly and Co.District Court, S.D. Alabama · 2006
  5. Cronus Offshore, Inc. v. Kerr McGee Oil & Gas Corp.District Court, E.D. Texas · 2004

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API