Staples v. Merck & Co., Inc.
District Court, N.D. Texas
1Opinion of the Court
Memorandum Opinion and Order
LYNN, District Judge.
A number of cases, separately removed, were consolidated into this ease. In each Notice of Removal and/or Amended Notice of Removal, Defendant Merck alleged that jurisdiction is proper in this Court because Plaintiffs fraudulently joined two Texas defendants: Dr. Harvey Resnick, M.D., and R/D Clinical Research, Incorporated (collectively, “Clinical Researchers”). If the Clinical Researchers were not fraudulently joined, then this case is non-removable under 28 U.S.C. § 1441(b). In December 2002, the Plaintiffs filed ten actions in multiple…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- American Tobacco Co., Inc. v. GrinnellTexas Supreme Court · 1997
- Great Plains Trust Co. v. Morgan Stanley Dean Witter & Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2002
- Greater Houston Transportation Co. v. PhillipsTexas Supreme Court · 1991
- Torrington Co. v. StutzmanTexas Supreme Court · 2001
- Ernst & Young, L.L.P. v. Pacific Mutual Life Insurance Co.Texas Supreme Court · 2001
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Moreno Energy, Inc. v. Marathon Oil Co.District Court, S.D. Texas · 2012
- Elmazouni v. Mylan, Inc.District Court, N.D. Texas · 2016
- Cantor v. WACHOVIA MORTGAGE, FSBDistrict Court, N.D. Texas · 2009
- Betts v. Eli Lilly and Co.District Court, S.D. Alabama · 2006
- Cronus Offshore, Inc. v. Kerr McGee Oil & Gas Corp.District Court, E.D. Texas · 2004
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.